![]() A latest social experiment report published in a Canadain magazine outlines how a community was enviably successful to encourage its people to keep their backyard clean with a simple reward policy. If the counsellors declare that families who properly do waste recycling would get tax rebates and other social benefits, many more people would be inspired. For instance, Japan, once daunted by the sheer amount of household rubbish, have successfully achieved their goal through public awareness and it can be a model for others.įurthermore, only punishment cannot motivate people to abide by the rules. Ordinary people have to realise the catastrophic consequences of their negligence and encouragement can play a better role than the fear of penalty. To do so, the authority can use mass media to educate people. Tracking those citizens and punishing them is not the main objective, rather educating and encouraging them is a better solution. Even after laws in place, many citizens already violate it. To begin with, complying with garbage management and waste recycling is a choice for many citizens. While I wholeheartedly welcome such laws, I do not agree that having laws in place is the only and best solution to curb it. Some opine that people do not recycle household trash in proper manners and strict laws are the only way to force citizens to do so. We live in a throwaway society and with the ever-increasing waste production every day, authorities in many countries are already finding it difficult to recycle the litter. We should not compromise on acts that would challenge our very existence on Earth. To conclude, for the sake of our own good, we should take waste recycling seriously and introduce laws and legislation that would require people to do so. Stern laws are, therefore, required to achieve good results. ![]() Waste recycling not only saves the planet from being harmed but also open the doors of possibility to produce many new products that are environment-friendly. There is no denying that inherent nature drives human to ignore things that are optional and abide by rules that are strict and unavoidable. For instance, a recent report from the UN shows that more people recycle waste in cities where not doing so imposes fines. Moreover, when a law imposes a monetary fine and other types of penalty, ordinary people have a tendency to follow them. ![]() If they are reluctant to do so, there must be a law to force them. People do not need to invest money, work in the recycling process or do anything rather than categorising their own-produced garbages and place them at a predefined location every day. However, the civic sense, advertisements and the government’s initiatives to educate people have failed to encourage citizens, in most of the cases, to take part in the litter recycling process. To begin with, it is common knowledge that everybody should take part in the waste recycling process to save the environment and to keep the surrounding clean. Sadly people do not spontaneously participate in garbage recycling and I believe that stringent laws are required to force them to recycle the debris they produce. With the rapid population explosion and the emergence of the through-away society, waste management has become a major concern for many. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. Write about the following topic: Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Last Updated: 3rd April 2020 GT Writing Task 2 (Essay Writing) Sample # 13
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |